Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Couples Therapy on Psychological Well-being and Distress Tolerance among Couples

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aftj.5.2.5

Keywords:

Solution-focused couples therapy, psychological well-being, distress tolerance, couples

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of solution-focused couples therapy on psychological well-being and distress tolerance.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study using a pre-test and post-test design with a control group and a follow-up phase. The population consisted of all couples attending counseling centers in Tehran during the last two months of the year 2021. A sample of 30 couples was selected using convenience sampling and randomly assigned to an experimental group (15 couples) and a control group (15 couples). The research instruments included the Ryff Psychological Well-being Scale (1988) and the Simons and Gaher Distress Tolerance Scale (2005). The experimental group received eight sessions of McDonald's (2007) solution-focused training in a group setting, whereas the control group received no intervention. Data were analyzed using covariance analysis with SPSS software version 21.

Findings: The results showed that solution-focused couples therapy had a significant effect on the dimensions of psychological well-being (F = 15.78, p = .001) and distress tolerance (F = 12.00, p = .001); these effects were maintained during the follow-up phase (p < .001).

Conclusion: Given the results, therapists can employ solution-focused couples therapy to enhance psychological well-being and distress tolerance among couples, which significantly affects the stability and strength of families.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Additional Files

Publication Timeline

Published

How to Cite

Rasti, M. S., & Mohammadi, A. (2024). Effectiveness of Solution-Focused Couples Therapy on Psychological Well-being and Distress Tolerance among Couples. Applied Family Therapy Journal (AFTJ) , 5(2), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aftj.5.2.5