Implicit Learning and Football Performance under Psychological Pressure: A Narrative Review
Keywords:
Implicit learning, motor skills, football, psychological pressure, choking under pressure, automaticity, skill acquisitionAbstract
Objective: This review aims to explore the potential of implicit learning to enhance football performance under psychological pressure. The focus is on examining how implicit learning might mitigate the negative effects of pressure and improve the consistency and effectiveness of football skills during high-stakes situations.
Materials and Methods: A systematic search strategy was employed to gather relevant research from databases such as SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Keywords included "implicit learning," "motor skills," "football," "pressure performance," and "choking under pressure." The review considered peer-reviewed articles published in English, focusing on studies that investigated the relationship between implicit learning and football performance under pressure.
Results: Implicit learning, characterized by the unconscious acquisition of skills through repeated practice, shows promise in enhancing football performance under pressure by promoting automaticity and reducing cognitive load. Studies have demonstrated that implicit learning can lead to more automatic and smoother motor skills, potentially making them less susceptible to disruption by pressure. Evidence from research on penalty kicks and other football-related tasks supports the effectiveness of implicit learning in high-pressure situations.
Conclusion: The review highlights the potential of implicit learning to buffer the effects of psychological pressure in football, promoting resilience and adaptability in high-stakes scenarios. Further research is needed to optimize training methods for implicit learning and explore its application across different football skills and pressure conditions. Integrating implicit learning strategies into football training programs could equip athletes with the mental tools to perform at their peak under pressure.
Downloads
References
1. Bartura K, Gorgulu R, Abrahamsen F, Gustafsson H. A
systematic review of ironic effects of motor task performance under
pressure: The past 25 years. International Review of Sport and
Exercise Psychology.1-40. [DOI]
2. Goldschmied N, Raphaeli M, Moothart S, Furley P. Free
throw shooting performance under pressure: a social psychology
critical review of research. International Journal of Sport and
Exercise Psychology. 2022;20(5):1397-415. [DOI]
3. Jackson R. Evaluating the evidence for implicit perceptual
learning: a re-analysis of Farrow and Abernethy (2002). Journal of
Sports Sciences. 2003;21(6):503-9. [PMID: 12846537] [DOI]
4. Masters R. Skill learning the implicit way—say no more!
Developing sport expertise: Routledge; 2007. p. 111-25
5. Kal E, Prosée R, Winters M, van der Kamp J. Does implicit
motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills
compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PLOS
ONE. 2018;13(9):e0203591. [PMID: 30183763] [PMCID:
PMC6124806] [DOI]
6. Masters RS, van Duijn T, Uiga L. Advances in implicit
motor learning. Skill acquisition in sport: Routledge; 2019. p. 77-
96.[PMID: 30917729] [DOI]
7. Raab M, Johnson JG. Implicit learning as a means to
intuitive decision making in sports. Intuition in judgment and
decision making. 2008:119-33.
8. Raab M, Masters RSW, Maxwell J, Arnold A, Schlapkohl
N, Poolton J. Discovery learning in sports: Implicit or explicit
processes? International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.
2009;7(4):413-30. [DOI]
9. Navarro M, van der Kamp J, Schor P, Savelsbergh GJP.
Implicit learning increases shot accuracy of football players when
making strategic decisions during penalty kicking. Human
Movement Science. 2018;61:72-80. [PMID: 30031272] [DOI]
10. Cabral DAR. The Effects of Implicit Learning, Practicing
with the Expectation of Teaching, and Anxiety Training on Motor
Performance Under Psychological Pressure: Auburn University;
2022.
11. Gabbett T, Masters R. Challenges and Solutions When
Applying Implicit Motor Learning Theory in a High Performance
Sport Environment: Examples from Rugby League. International
Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2011;6(4):567-75. [DOI]
12. Poolton JM, Zachry TL. So You Want to Learn Implicitly?
Coaching and Learning through Implicit Motor Learning
Techniques. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching.
2007;2(1):67-78. [DOI]
13. Plessner H, Schweizer G, Brand R, O’Hare D. A multiplecue learning approach as the basis for understanding and improving
soccer referees’ decision making. In: Raab M, Johnson JG, Heekeren
HR, editors. Progress in Brain Research. 174: Elsevier; 2009. p. 151-
8.[PMID: 19477337] [DOI]
14. Shafizadeh M, Platt GK. Effect of Verbal Cueing on
Trajectory Anticipation in the Penalty Kick among Novice Football
Goalkeepers. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2012;114(1):174-84.
[PMID: 22582686] [DOI]
15. Neal A, Hesketh B. Episodic knowledge and implicit
learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1997;4(1):24-37. [DOI]
16. Hall J. Developing expert performance in sport: integrating
working memory training into football coaching. 2018.
17. Farkasová K. The effects of explicit and implicit motor
learning interventions for football goalkeepers. 2016.
18. Verburgh L, Scherder EJA, van Lange PAM, Oosterlaan J.
The key to success in elite athletes? Explicit and implicit motor
learning in youth elite and non-elite soccer players. Journal of Sports
Sciences. 2016;34(18):1782-90. [PMID: 26788666] [DOI]
19. Reber AS. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: General. 1989;118(3):219-35. [DOI]
20. Pavlov PI. Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the
physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Annals of neurosciences.
2010;17(3):136. [PMID: 25205891] [PMCID: PMC4116985] [DOI]
21. Anderson JR. Cognitive psychology and its implications:
Macmillan; 2005.
22. Eysenck M. Anxiety and cognition: A unified theory:
Psychology Press; 2014. [DOI]
23. Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human performance. 1967.
24. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and
performance: A situation-based learning approach: Human kinetics;
2008.
25. Schultz W, Tremblay L, Hollerman JR. Reward
Processing in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex and Basal Ganglia.
Cerebral Cortex. 2000;10(3):272-83. [PMID: 10731222] [DOI]
26. Doyon J, Bellec P, Amsel R, Penhune V, Monchi O,
Carrier J, et al. Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally
related brain structures to motor learning. Behavioural Brain
Research. 2009;199(1):61-75. [PMID: 19061920] [DOI]
27. Bastian AJ. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum
adapts feedforward movement control. Current Opinion in
Neurobiology. 2006;16(6):645-9. [PMID: 17071073] [DOI]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
