<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Inc. </PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Poultry Sciences and Avian Diseases</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2981-135X</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 15</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Comparative Serum Immune Responses to Bacterial Ghost and Liposomal APEC Vaccine Formulations in Broiler Chickens</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Comparative Serum Immune Responses to Bacterial Ghost and Liposomal APEC Vaccine Formulations in Broiler Chickens</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>10</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.jpsad.205</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study compared the preliminary serum immune-marker responses induced by two vaccine preparations against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) in broiler chickens: a bacterial ghost preparation (BGs) and a liposome-based preparation (LIPO). Serum IL-4, IL-10, IL-12, IL-1β, IFN-γ, and total IgY were measured by ELISA to evaluate humoral, cellular, and inflammatory responses relative to a negative control group. Overall differences among the three groups were statistically significant for all measured markers (p&amp;lt;0.0001). Direct comparison of the vaccinated groups showed significantly higher IL-10, IL-1β, and total IgY concentrations in the BGs group, whereas IL-4 was significantly higher in the LIPO group. IL-12 and IFN-γ did not differ significantly between the two vaccinated groups. These findings indicate that the two preparations generated distinct preliminary serum immune-marker profiles. Because protective efficacy was not evaluated in an APEC challenge model, further studies are required before either preparation can be considered an effective vaccine against colibacillosis.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Bacterial ghost, liposomal vaccine, Cytokines, APEC, Alum hydroxide gel, cellular immunity</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/jpsad/article/download/6081/11615</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
