Novel Insights into Immunity, Diagnosis, and Vaccination of Avian Leukosis
Abstract
Avian leukosis virus (ALV) is an oncogenic retrovirus that has caused significant damage to the poultry industry worldwide. Despite extensive research on this virus, its presence in certain parts of the world continues to attract researchers' attention. It appears that advancements in laboratory techniques toward a better understanding of the immune system's interaction with this virus and the diagnosis of the virus itself can contribute to more effective measures against it. Chickens can acquire ALV infections through natural exposure, developing virus-neutralizing antibodies that restrict viral load but have limited impact on tumor development. ALV has evolved strategies to evade the host's innate immune response, such as targeting cellular proteins involved in signaling pathways like the interferon response, which is crucial for initial antiviral defense. Recent advances in viral detection techniques, including monoclonal antibodies, proteomic analysis, and recombinase-aided amplification, have improved diagnosis and surveillance of emerging avian leukosis virus strains. The present review study has collected up-to-date information on this disease's immunity, diagnosis, and vaccination methods, aiming to provide insights for combating the virus.
Introduction
In 1958, Howard Temin and Harry Rubin took the first steps toward proving the ability of viral particles to transform normal cells into cancer cells. Avian Leukosis Virus (ALV) is a retrovirus that causes neoplastic diseases, immunosuppression, and disadvantages, resulting in economic loss. The first reports related to the virus were made in 1869 and 1896, and it was named "leukemia in birds"(1-3).
Structurally, the ALV virion core contains five non-glycosylated proteins encoded by the gag/pro gene: MA (matrix, p19), p10, or CA (capsid, p27), which is the main gs (Gag) antigen in the core-shell. NC (nucleocapsid, p12) is involved in RNA processing, and PR (protease, p15) is involved in cutting protein precursors. The virion envelope contains two glycoproteins encoded by the env gene: SU (surface, gp85) and knob-like structures on the viral surface that determine the subtype specificity of the ALSV viral envelope. This protein plays a vital role in virus identification and related studies. TM (transmembrane, gp37) represents a protein that crosses the membrane and connects Knob-like structures to the surface (Figure 1) (4). Avian leukosis virus is classified into ten viral subgroups, designated A through J. Subgroups (A-E & J) mainly infect chickens and turkeys and are classified according to the viral envelope, host range, and cross-neutralization test. Other unusual leukosis subgroups, such as F, G, H, and I, primarily represent endogenous ALVs in pheasants, partridges, and quails and affect wild birds (4,5).
A new subtype of ALV, ALV-K, was recently identified in domestic Chinese chickens in 2012. The gp85 region of ALV-K strains showed more than 90% similarity with several Japanese fowl glioma viruses (FGV) and an ALV strain (TW-3593) isolated from Taiwan province (6,7). Recent data suggest that ALV-K is closely related to subgroup A and utilizes the same entry receptor as ALV-A (8).
Env and LTR sequences play an essential role in the virulence of ALV-K and ALV-J. Additionally, Env is primarily involved in the pathogenesis of ALV-K. After evaluating the genomic sequences of this subtype and checking the ability of the virus to replicate using the luciferase reporter method, as well as checking the rate of growth retardation and immune suppression in SPF chickens, they found that the reason for the difference in the rate of pathogenicity and virus replication is the difference in the sequences of these two genes (9).
Based on the transmission mode, they can be further classified into "exogenous" and "endogenous" retroviruses. ALVs transmitted from one bird to another through eggs or contact are called "exogenous" viruses, and all carcinogenic ALVs fall into this category. However, some ALVs exist as genome-integrated proviruses and are genetically transmitted as Mendelian genes, either as complete viral genomes (such as subtype E) or, more commonly, as incomplete genomes encoding retroviral products. Several such endogenous retroviruses have been identified in the chicken genome. They are generally non-carcinogenic but may affect the bird's response to exogenous ALV infection by inducing immune tolerance (10).
Poultry neoplastic diseases encompass various conditions characterized by a common feature: neoplasia, which consists of one or more types of cells that, through their growth and multiplication, can sometimes cause organ dysfunction. Poultry neoplastic diseases are categorized into two general groups: diseases with infectious causes and non-infectious diseases (11). Leukosis is also one of the contagious diseases that cause neoplasia, for which information has already been recorded.
Avian leukosis can also be classified according to the type of tumor that develops: lymphoid leukosis (LL), a tumor of B lymphocytes, is one of the most common forms of leukosis. LL occurs in chicks from about four months of age and is usually caused by ALV subgroups A and B. Significant pathologic changes include diffuse or focal enlargement of the bursa of Fabricius, liver, spleen, and other organs due to the incorporation of extravascular foci of immature lymphoid cells (12).
Erythroid leukosis or erythroblastosis is an unusual tumor of erythroid cells that occurs mainly in adult chickens. In affected birds, the liver, spleen, and sometimes the kidneys are moderately and diffusely enlarged, often appearing bright cherry red. Myeloid leukosis (ML) broadly includes both myeloblastic (myeloblastosis) and myelocytic (myelocytomatosis) forms (10,13).
Myeloid leukosis (ML) broadly includes both myeloblastic (myeloblastosis) and myelocytic (myelocytomatosis) forms. This disease is particularly prevalent in broiler breeders infected with the ALV-J subtype. However, the losses caused by this disease have decreased significantly in most parts of the world following the eradication of the primary breeding flocks. ALV is also associated with various solid tumors, including fibrosarcoma, chondroma, hemangioma, histiocytic sarcoma, mesothelioma, nephroblastoma, osteoma, and osteopetrosis (10).
Avian immunity
The immune response of birds can only be understood by knowing its basic structure. Lymphoid tissues are either epithelial in origin (e.g., thymus and bursa of Fabricius) or mesenchymal (e.g., spleen and bone marrow) and are colonized by hematopoietic cells through the blood. The primary lymphoid organs include the thymus and the bursa of Fabricius, occupied by hematopoietic stem cells. Then, the mature cells enter the blood circulation, enhancing immunity. The peripheral lymphoid organs, including the spleen, cecal tonsils, Peyer's patches, and Meckel's diverticulum, as well as the Harderian gland and peripheral lymph nodes in the intestine, bronchi, skin, and nose, are colonized. T and B-dependent regions are mainly occupied by T and B cells in peripheral tissues (11).
Primary lymphoid organs
- Thymus:
It appears on the fifth day of embryonic life and after hatching. It continues to grow until the age of 3-4 months and regresses with the onset of sexual maturity. Its peak activity occurs at a young age. The thymus is responsible for the maturation and differentiation of stem cells into thymus-dependent or thymus-derived lymphocytes, also known as T cells, which play a significant role in cellular immunity (14).
- Bursa of Fabricius/cloacal bursa:
It is a hollow, sac-like, or oval epithelial lymphatic extension of the hindgut located in the caudal body cavity and connected to the dorsal region of the cloaca by a short duct. Bursal mucosa has 11-13 longitudinal folds. It is responsible for the maturation and differentiation of stem cells into bursa-dependent or bursa-derived lymphocytes, also known as B lymphocytes. B cell plays a significant role in antibody-mediated immunity. On the other hand, this organ can play a role as a secondary lymphoid organ (15).
Secondary lymphoid organs
Mature B and T cells from primary or mature lymphoid organs migrate to these sites via immune migration or peripheralization. These areas include several points of the body:
- Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissues (GALT):
These tissues extend throughout the digestive tract (16). The submucosal layer contains aggregates of lymphoid cells known as the esophageal tonsil, a component of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT). These lymphoid cells form 6 to 8 discrete units that encircle the opening to the pre-gastric region. A delicate, fibrous sheath encapsulates the esophageal tonsil, commonly referred to as a "tonsillar crypt" (17,18). The stomach contains tubular glands situated beneath the pre-gastric mucosa. Meckel's diverticulum, a vestigial remnant of the embryonic yolk sac, is found along the ileum. Lymphatic rings, located at the junction of the jejunum and the ileum, serve important immunological functions. Similarly, cecal tonsils are positioned at the interface of the ileum and the cecum. Peyer's patches, aggregations of lymphoid tissue, are distributed throughout the intestinal mucosa and are particularly prominent in the ileum, contributing to the immune surveillance within the gastrointestinal tract. (11).
- Head-Associated Lymphoid Tissues (HALT):
The harderian or supraocular gland is an endocrine and immune-related gland that mainly produces IgA and other immunoglobulins. Approximately 80% of the population of lymphoid cells consists of B lymphocytes and 20% are T lymphocytes (17). The lymphatic tissues associated with the conjunctiva are especially prominent in turkeys, and the glands in the nasal cavity and lacrimal ducts are other lymphatic tissues related to the head (19).
- Skin-Associated Lymphoid Tissues (SALT):
Lymphocytes are found scattered throughout certain tissues, such as the skin. Lymphatic structures are accumulations of lymph cells under the skin, among other lymphatic organs (11). Notably, some researchers have disputed the presence of SALT in birds (20,21)
- Bronchial Associated Lymphoid Tissues (BALT):
In chickens and turkeys, the initiation of respiratory humoral immune responses involves the participation of lymphoid tissues. These tissues are vital for developing local or respiratory mucosal immunity, a fundamental immune mechanism. Key components of these tissues include the presence of lymphoid cell aggregations within the submucosal layer of the respiratory tract, the existence of lymph nodes in the lung, and the involvement of the bronchial epithelium. These components collectively contribute to establishing and maintaining a robust immune response within the respiratory mucosa, wherein secretory IgA plays a pivotal role (22).
- Spleen:
The largest secondary lymphatic organ consists of white and red parts (pulps) that comprise about 80% of the spleen tissue. The white pulp surrounds the blood vessels and has morphologically distinct areas (23).
- Mural lymph nodes:
These are organized accumulations of lymphoid tissue that are circular, elongated, oval, non-capsulated, and contain diffuse lymphoid tissue within which are usually found three or four germinal centers either within or closely applied to the lymphatic vessels, especially those of the limbs and neck (24).
- Pineal gland:
It is located between the hemispheres of the brain and the cerebellum. Bird glands play a crucial role in maintaining the circadian rhythm, particularly in laboratory conditions (25).
- Bone marrow:
This organ is a primary lymphatic organ, but after immune migration, it will also act as a secondary immune organ. As a secondary lymphoid organ, it contains B lymphocytes, mononuclear cells, and T lymphocytes (26).
- Cervical-thoracic nodes:
They are positioned in the chest's entrances, and their structure is relatively simple. Due to the presence of a main or central sinus that probably forms an intranodal lymphatic vessel, the lymph flow in them is relatively fast (27).
Like all animals, chickens have a robust internal defense against diseases. Air, food, housing systems, and sick or carrier animals are responsible for entering most pathogenic agents into the environment. Birds' innate and adaptive immune systems protect and maintain their health. Together, they form an effective defense against invading pathogens.
Immunity associated with Avian leukosis
Active immunity
Under natural circumstances, chickens acquire exogenous Avian Leukosis Virus (ALV) infections from their fellow flock members or their environment. Following an initial period of viremia, the infected chickens produce virus-neutralizing antibodies against the viral envelope antigens, which reach high levels and remain present throughout their lifespan. These virus-neutralizing antibodies limit the viral load within the birds, thereby restricting the occurrence of neoplastic growth. However, it is generally accepted that these antibodies have a limited direct impact on tumor development. Upon inoculation of ALV in chickens at or after four weeks of age, a transient viremic phase becomes detectable after one week, followed by the appearance of antibodies at three weeks and beyond (28). Although antibodies against the gs antigen may also be present in ALV-infected birds, they do not influence tumor growth (4). In addition, previous studies have provided evidence for the existence of cytotoxic lymphocytes that specifically target viral envelope antigens in avian species that were immunized with either ALV or Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) (17). These cytotoxic lymphocytes play a crucial role in cellular immunity, and it has been suggested that the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) is involved in the regression of sarcomas (10,29).
Chickens congenitally infected by ALV do not show an immune response to the virus. Instead, they become immunologically resistant to the virus and develop persistent viremia without producing neutralizing antibodies (30). Infection at a young age with subtype J, in particular, is likely to be the reason for immune tolerance (31,32). Infection with ALV can reduce primary and secondary antibody responses, as well as cellular immunity (30,33).
Passive immunity
The breeder transfers serum antibodies, especially IgG, to its offspring through the egg yolk, producing passive immunity that lasts 3–4 weeks. Inactivating antibodies delay infection by ALV, reduce the incidence of viremia and virus shedding, and reduce the incidence of tumors (34).
Innate immunity
A specific field of study has focused on the role of innate immunity in response to ALV infection. Innate immunity is the first line of defense against viral infections, comprising various cells and molecules that recognize and respond to viral pathogens. Studies have shown that certain innate immune cells, including natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, play a crucial role in controlling ALV infection in chickens. The mechanisms by which ALV evades the host's innate immune response are poorly understood. Recent studies have shown that cytokine-containing protein (CIS) homology with induced Src and suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) can negatively affect the innate immune response and promote viral replication. In addition, ALV-J can suppress IFN expression indirectly by targeting host proteins, such as Disruptor of Telomeric Silence 1-like (DOT1L), which inhibits the activation of the type I interferon signal transduction pathway. P53 also plays a role in the host response to ALV infection by activating the innate immune response and inhibiting the ALV-J long terminal repeat (LTR) activity. They are considering the unique genomic structure of ALV as a retrovirus and its persistent infection in host cells. ALV may achieve innate immune evasion by blocking not only the signal transduction pathway for type I IFN expression but also other pathways. However, further studies are needed to determine the important ALV viral proteins that target cellular proteins involved in the host's innate immune signaling pathways (35).
Immune evasion
To replicate and disseminate within a host, a virus must be able to evade the host's robust immune system. In response to the viral invasion, the host activates various signaling systems that participate in immune defense mechanisms (36). Interferon (IFN) pathway activation represents the most crucial event in the host-pathogen interaction. Interferons play a significant role in the initial immune response to viral infections, as they bind to their receptors and regulate hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) via the JAK/STAT pathway. These genes interfere with viral replication, providing sufficient time for an appropriate adaptive immune response to be established (37,38). Based on homology and specific receptors, interferons are classified into type I, which includes IFN-alpha and IFN-beta, type II (IFN-gamma), and type III (IFN-lambda) (39). Type I and III interferons are considered the primary antiviral cytokines, and type II interferons also possess antiviral properties (40). Each interferon type can induce a unique set of ISGs, although some ISGs overlap (41).
Other aspects of ALV infection
A 2021 study by researchers found that the expression of some genes related to the immune response, such as TLR7 and IL-6, was increased in ALV-infected chickens. They also found that the expression of some microRNAs, such as miR-146a, was decreased in infected chickens, which may contribute to ALV-induced immunosuppression (42).
Another study investigated the effect of ALV infection on the gut microbiome in chickens. The researchers found that ALV infection alters the composition and diversity of the gut microbiome, which may affect the chicken's immune response. These consequences include the disruption of the type and number of different bacteria, which can be considered a result of virus pathogenesis. This study studied the feces of local chickens infected with subtype J using a 16S rRNA gene sequence. An increase in bacteria and proteobacteria and a decrease in Firmicutes were observed (43).
Genetic Resistance
Recent studies have shown that genetic resistance to ALV may be possible by identifying genetic markers associated with resistance. These markers can be used in selective breeding programs to breed chickens that are more resistant to ALV infection. A mutation in the tvb receptor gene confers resistance to infections by subgroups B, D, or E. Similarly, deletions that disrupt the mRNA splice variant of the tva receptor gene lead to reduced susceptibility to subgroup A infections. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) has been identified in the SLCO1B3 gene, associated with resistance to ALV-J infection in chickens. The SLCO1B3 gene encodes an organic anion transporter protein involved in the cellular uptake of drugs and other substances. It has been found that the identified SNP in this study is associated with decreased expression of the SLCO1B3 gene, resulting in reduced susceptibility to ALV-J infection (12).
ALV infection depends on the presence of subtype-specific cellular receptors, and birds that lack specific receptors are genetically resistant to infection by the respective ALV subtype (44,45). The introduction of genetic resistance to ALV subtypes, such as A and B, has been employed by poultry companies through selective breeding as a strategy for eradication. Recently, new resistance using gene editing approaches has been introduced for ALV subtype J infection (46,47).
Inheritance of cellular resistance to infection is a simple Mendelian type. Specific autosomal independent fragments control infection responses with ALVs of subgroups A, B, and C and are designated tva, tvb, and tvc, respectively. Each tv fragment has alleles for susceptibility and resistance, called tvas, tvar. tvbs, tvbr, and tvcs, tvcr, respectively; susceptibility alleles dominate over resistance alleles. These genes are usually abbreviated as ar, etc. Each fragment likely has multiple alleles that encode for different levels of susceptibility (48,49).
Chickens with genetic resistance to infection and tumor induction by different subtypes of ALVs are usually unable to develop antibodies (50). Genetic resistance to tumor growth has been studied mainly with sarcoma, determined by a dominant gene, R-RS-1, located in the chicken MHC locus (51).
Cell surface protein Tva as an entry receptor for ALV of classical subtype A and new subtype K. Since both viruses are a significant concern for the poultry industry, a frameshift deletion in the tva fragment was introduced in a study aimed at eliminating Tva expression and creating a virus-resistant chicken line. Tva released by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in chicken primordial germ cells was inoculated into the testicles of recipient roosters. Tva-negative chickens showed complete resistance to subtypes A and K of the ALV. In contrast, Tva-positive relatives were sensitive. Additionally, in this experiment, they identified a specific impairment in cobalamin/vitamin B12 metabolism in Tva-deleted chicks, consistent with the recently recognized physiological function of Tva as a cobalamin receptor in complex with the transcobalamin transporter (46).
The MHC class I (MHC-I) in birds, also known as the MHC-B complex, is a set of genes, many of which are polymorphic, that play a crucial role in immune responses. These genes encode proteins essential for the immune system, specifically antigen-presenting molecules involved in antigen recognition and elimination. The diversity within these genes may contribute to their functional role in resistance against leukosis viruses (52).
In a recent study, CRISPR/Cas9 technology was employed to generate genetically modified chickens with a specific mutation in the chicken ALV-J receptor Na+/H+ exchanger type 1 (chNHE1). Recent research provides compelling evidence that this mutation offers protection against the virulent ALV-J prototype strain HPRS-103 in a commercially bred chicken line (NHE1ΔW38). It is observed that a significant impairment in the replication of HPRS-103 in NHE1ΔW38 birds and ALV-J-specific antigen was not detected in cloacal swabs at later time points. Moreover, NHE1ΔW38 chickens infected with ALV-J exhibited greater weight gain when compared to their non-transgenic counterparts (NHE1W38). Histopathological analysis revealed the development of ALV-J typical pathology in various organs of NHE1W38 chickens, while no pathological lesions were observed in NHE1ΔW38 chickens. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that this mutation has the potential to confer resistance to highly pathogenic ALV-J infection in a commercial chicken line, offering promising prospects for combating this pathogen and improving overall animal health in real-world settings (53).
A study conducted by Zhao et al. aimed to investigate the potential influence of the PMAIP1 gene on the replication of avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) and the underlying regulatory mechanisms. The researchers initially examined the expression of PMAIP1 using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Furthermore, they manipulated the expression of PMAIP1 in chicken fibroblast cells (DF-1) and evaluated its impact on ALV-J infection through qRT-PCR, immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and western blotting (WB). The study's results demonstrated a significant downregulation of PMAIP1 in the spleen, lung, and kidney, accompanied by an upregulation in the bursa and liver of chickens infected with ALV-J compared to uninfected chickens. Additionally, DF-1 cells infected with ALV-J exhibited a noticeable upregulation of PMAIP1 at various time points. The overexpression of PMAIP1 was found to enhance ALV-J replication, interferon expression, and the production of proinflammatory factors. Conversely, interference with PMAIP1 led to contrasting outcomes. Furthermore, the study revealed that PMAIP1 promotes virus replication by influencing mitochondrial function. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the PMAIP1 gene facilitates ALV-J replication by modulating mitochondrial function, thereby contributing to our understanding of mitochondria-related genes and their involvement in ALV-J infection (54).
Diagnosis of Avian Leukosis
Oncogenic retroviruses vertically transmit the ALV, which is economically important and affects laying and broiler chickens, as well as ducks, and even wild birds. They may also affect poultry vaccines during preparation (especially in eggs) and cause infection (55).
Leukosis in different species of birds causes various clinical symptoms, including ruffled feathers, emaciation, grounding, pale color of the crown and beard, and reduced egg production in laying hens (56). Additionally, infection can lead to disruptions in cell growth and the development of neoplastic changes, and it is primarily associated with myeloid leukosis (57). Most infected farm chickens show subclinical symptoms such as reduced egg production, immunosuppression, or growth retardation (58). Subclinical leukosis infection causes economic problems much more than its clinical form, which causes tumors and death. The prevalence of leukosis in chicken flocks has been reduced and controlled in most countries with an advanced poultry industry (59).
The host specificity of each viral subgroup is determined by the gp85 protein, which forms spherical structures on the viral surface and plays a role in the viral attachment process (60,61)
There are several techniques for identifying viral samples. Conventional methods for virus detection are time-consuming, expensive, and often poor, requiring specialized facilities and trained personnel. Simple instrumentation and rapid, low-cost virus detection can help prevent the spread of the virus (62). Over the last decade, the occurrence of avian leukosis has been reduced due to the international ALV eradication program (59). Because new recombinant strains and even new subtypes have emerged frequently in recent years, the risk of developing leukosis still exists (63). K strain, as mentioned, is one of the recently identified strains. However, these isolated strains of ALV-K had no or little pathogenicity (64). A specific type of ALV-K, designated as HB2015032, was identified in Hubei Province, China, in 2015, and it exhibited tumorigenicity (65). These new ALV-K strains indicate an increased prevalence and pathogenicity of ALV-K in chicken flocks in China. (66).
There is still no specific and rapid diagnostic method for ALV-K. For diagnosis, a specific antibody that recognizes ALV-K is needed. In a study, a monoclonal antibody (Mab) called Km3 was prepared against the GP85 protein gene of ALV-K, and this Mab defined the antigenic epitope. It may serve as a useful tool for diagnosing ALV-K in the future. gp85 gene of ALV-K HB2018003 is amplified with a list of specific primer pairs. The gp85 gene was cloned into prokaryotic expression vectors and transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). Gp85 production was induced and purified using affinity chromatography. Various methods, including ELISA and immunofluorescent antibody, were used for identification. The epitope recognized by Mab Km3 was determined by dividing the gene into fragments, amplifying them through PCR, and analyzing their interaction with Km3 through western blot analysis. The analysis of the obtained data revealed specific peptide segments of the Gp85 protein associated with subgroup K (67).
Seminal extracellular vesicles (SE) were isolated and purified from the seminal plasma of ALV-J-infected roosters (SE-ALV-J), which were shown to contain ALV-J genomic RNA and proteins by RNA sequencing, quantitative PCR, and Western blotting methods. In addition, SE-ALV-J was shown to transmit ALV-J infection to host cells and establish infection in the mother herd. Furthermore, artificial inoculation experiments showed that SE-ALV-J transmitted ALV-J infection to SPF chickens and subsequently caused vertical transmission of ALV-J from SPF chickens to offspring (68).
One recently used method is proteomic analysis. In this method, protein samples are digested with a trypsin solution at 37°C for 4 hours, using an enzyme-to-protein ratio of 1:20 by weight. The resulting peptide mixture is extracted, desalted, and dried. Nano LC-MS/MS is used for proteomic analysis. Finally, this peptide is ionized by the nanoESI source and then enters the Q-Exactive HF X mass spectrometer to detect the dependent data mode (DDA) (69).
In a study involving histopathological analysis of samples collected from chickens and ducks with tumors, as well as molecular analysis of the gp85 surface protein antigen by determining the recombination between different strains, the relationship between ALV-J and tumor formation was investigated. The results showed greater enlargement of internal organs and, in some cases, nodular enlargement. Histopathological examinations indicated the penetration of myeloid cells in the studied tissues (70).
Subgroup E of leukosis virus, endogenous retroviruses are limited to domestic birds and their wild offspring. In industrial chickens, ALV-E has a detrimental effect on production and serves as a source for recombining exogenous retroviruses. Researchers identified 974 avian leukosis virus subgroup E (ALV-E) strains from 407 sampled chickens in Ethiopia, Iraq, and Nigeria. Advanced bioinformatics methods were employed to analyze whole-genome sequencing data and identify ALV-E insertions. Confirmation was done using PCR assays, and a binary matrix was created to indicate the presence or absence of each ALV-E in each bird. The data was visualized using t-SNE and hierarchical clustering. The genotypes were associated with geographic, phenotypic, and epidemiological data. The distribution of ALV-E genomes was analyzed and compared to a simulated dataset. The study revealed over 850 novel ALVEs, significantly expanding the known diversity of these retroviral elements (71).
In a novel approach, a real-time reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) assay was developed to detect ALV. Specifically, a 114-bp target sequence from the ALV P12 gene was amplified using reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification. This method demonstrated rapid, highly specific, cost-effective, and simple operational characteristics. It could detect as low as 10 copies of ALV RNA molecules per reaction without cross-reactivity with other avian viruses. Furthermore, the RT-RAA assay exhibited a high level of concordance with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for clinical samples, indicating its potential as a valuable diagnostic method for ALV detection (72).
The gp85 protein is recognized as the primary envelope protein of avian leukosis subgroup J (ALV-J) and plays a crucial role in virus neutralization. In a study, researchers aimed to map the specific epitope within the ALV-J gp85 protein using synthetic peptides and develop diagnostic methods based on this epitope for detecting ALV-J infection. The study results revealed that the monoclonal antibody JE9 recognized a specific motif, 83WDPQEL88, within the gp85 protein. Through homology analysis, it was determined that this motif was highly conserved among various ALV-J strains. Furthermore, the performance of the epitope-based peptide ELISA was evaluated using 240 serum samples obtained from different chicken farms. Notably, the epitope-based peptide ELISA demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity for detecting antibodies to ALV-J compared to a commercially available ELISA kit. In conclusion, a novel B-cell epitope recognized by the JE9 monoclonal antibody was identified in the study. The peptide-based ELISA developed based on this epitope holds potential for laboratory viral diagnosis, routine surveillance in chicken farms, and advancing our understanding of the pathogenesis of ALV-J (73).
Control and Eradication methods
ALV can be transmitted vertically (congenitally or through the oocyte) or through contact via horizontal routes. In vertical transmission, eggs are infected with the virus in the oviduct, resulting in embryo infection during development. This route of congenital infection leads to birds becoming viral carriers by shedding the virus in vaginal swabs, egg albumin, and embryos, whose detection provides the basis for ALV eradication programs. Congenitally infected chickens are important sources of contact infection in the hatchery and during the rearing period. The meconium and feces of congenitally infected chickens contain high concentrations of ALV. The horizontal transmission mode is responsible for the high incidence of infection in the flock (10).
A 2022 research study in China found that ALV infection was widespread among all five chicken breeds, including three specific Chinese local chicken species. The local breeds had a higher incidence of ALV infection, highlighting the need for intensified eradication efforts in these breeds. Current diagnostic methods, such as the ELISA kit and test strip, are unable to differentiate between exogenous and endogenous ALV strains. However, clinical investigations revealed typical Avian Leukosis symptoms in diseased birds from positive flocks, including abdominal enlargement, liver tumors, shank protuberances, and hemangiomas. These findings offer valuable insights into assessing the status of virus infection and associated risks in poultry farms. Future research should focus on isolating and studying the subtypes of exogenous epidemic ALV strains using DF-1 cells, which exclude the growth of the endogenous virus. Long-term and continuous ALV eradication efforts are crucial for conventional and local chicken breeds, supported by real-time epidemiological monitoring, to effectively prevent and control this poultry tumor disease (74).
ALV is known to cause B-cell lymphomas and other malignancies in chickens by activating oncogenes through insertional mechanisms. Activation of the c-myc oncogene has been frequently observed in tumors induced by ALV. In a 2022 study, Roy et al. utilized the HP45 cell line derived from an ALV-transformed B-lymphoma. They employed in situ CRISPR-Cas9 editing to specifically target and delete the integrated proviral long terminal repeat (LTR). The aim was to investigate the effects of LTR deletion on gene expression and cell proliferation. They found that targeted deletion of the LTR resulted in a significant decrease in the expression of multiple LTR-regulated genes, including c-myc.
Furthermore, LTR deletion induced apoptosis in HP45 cells, affecting their proliferation and underscoring the importance of LTR-mediated regulation of key genes. While the deletion of multiple LTR-regulated genes had global effects on gene expression and cellular functions, the deletion of c-myc had a pronounced impact on HP45 cell proliferation, resembling the phenotype observed with LTR deletion. This underscores the significance of c-myc expression in ALV-induced lymphomagenesis. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential of targeted LTR editing for inhibiting retrovirus-induced transformation on a global scale and provide insights into the roles of LTR-regulated genes in ALV-induced neoplastic transformation (75).
The successful eradication of ALV hinges upon interrupting the vertical transmission of the virus from infected hens to their offspring, as well as preventing subsequent reinfection. Eradication strategies primarily revolve around identifying and removing hens that serve as sources of ALV transmission, thereby safeguarding the embryos and resulting chicks. By targeting these key transmission pathways, efforts can be directed towards effectively mitigating the spread of ALV within poultry populations. Such hens that are avirulent and shedding virus are usually detected by ELISA testing their cloacal or vaginal swabs, semen, or egg albumin for high levels of gs-ALV antigen. Continuous monitoring and removal of infected birds breaks the virus transmission cycle and eradicates ALV (45,76).
In a recent study in Egypt, a comprehensive investigation of avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) was conducted, involving the collection and analysis of 117 blood samples and 57 tissue specimens from various organs. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of this viral tumor disease in broiler flocks located in the El-Sharqia, El-Dakahliya, and Al-Qalyubiyya Egyptian governorates from 2021 to 2023, employing various diagnostic techniques and determining the genetic diversity of the ALV-J gp85 gene. ALV-J was successfully isolated using chicken embryo rough cell culture, leading to observable signs of aggregation, rounding, and degeneration. Notably, embryonic death, stunting, and curling were observed upon egg inoculation. Out of the 117 serum samples tested using ELISA, 79 samples (67.52%) were positive for ALV-J. Histopathological examination revealed the presence of tumors characterized by well-differentiated myelocytes, lymphoid cells, or both, primarily observed in the liver, spleen, and kidneys. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the presence of myelocytomatosis-positive signals in these organs. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis targeting the ALV-J gp85 gene confirmed the presence of a 545-base pair fragment in 43 out of the 57 positive samples (75.4%).
Additionally, two of the positive samples were sequenced and deposited in the Genbank with accession numbers OR509852-OR509853. Phylogenetic analysis based on the gp85 gene demonstrated that the ALV-J Dakahlia-2 isolate shared genetic relatedness with ALV-EGY/YA 2021.3, ALV-EGY/YA 2021.4, ALV-EGY/YA 2021.14, and ALV-EGY/YA 2021.9 exhibiting amino acid identity percentages of 96%, 97%; 96%, and 96%, respectively. This study offers valuable insights into the prevalence and genetic characteristics of ALV-J in Egyptian broiler flocks, thereby contributing to the understanding and management of this viral disease (77).
Vaccination
A research study conducted in Nigeria aimed to assess the presence of ALV subgroups in commercial live and inactivated viral vaccines. Forty-four vaccines were collected from various distributors and veterinary sales centers in Nigeria, and PCR screening was performed to detect ALV subgroups A, B, C, D, and J. The results showed that 9% of the tested vaccines were positive for ALV-J, while no other subgroups were detected. These findings indicate contamination of ALV-J in commercially sold poultry vaccines in Nigeria, emphasizing the urgent need for comprehensive screening and quality control measures in vaccine production and distribution within the poultry industry (78).
Autophagy is a vital cellular process that degrades proteins and damaged organelles, playing a fundamental role in maintaining cellular homeostasis within eukaryotic organisms. Moreover, autophagy plays a significant role in the immune response by protecting the host against pathogenic invasions. However, it has been observed that avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) infection impedes the autophagic process within infected cells. Researchers recently embarked on an investigation to explore potential strategies for developing ALV-J vaccines. In one field of study, autophagy induction was achieved using rapamycin, a pharmacological agent known to stimulate autophagy. A DNA vaccine was also developed, targeting autophagy and the major antigens associated with ALV-J. Laboratory experimentations confirmed the successful expression of the fusion protein under controlled conditions. The study demonstrated that combining the vaccine with rapamycin enhanced its effectiveness in combating ALV-J infection, primarily by promoting autophagy induction. These findings suggest that developing targeted vaccines capable of modulating autophagy represents a promising avenue for ALV-J vaccine research and development (79).
In a study on avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) vaccines, researchers investigated the use of genetically modified Lactobacillus plantarum NC8, an invasive bacterial strain, as a delivery vehicle for ALV-J antigens. The modified strain expressed the gp85 protein from ALV-J and was administered orally to chicks. The immune response was assessed through various parameters, including T lymphocyte quantification, splenocyte proliferation, cytokine levels, antibody measurements, and examination of mucosal antibodies. The study found that the modified L. plantarum strain significantly enhanced the cellular, humoral, and mucosal immune responses of chicks. This approach shows promise for developing live ALV-J vaccines, highlighting the potential of invasive bacterial strains as effective delivery platforms for ALV-J antigens (80).
Researchers have developed a multi-epitope vaccine targeting avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) by identifying a neutralizing epitope called hr1 within the hypervariable region of ALV-J. The multi-epitope gene was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21, and the resulting protein specifically reacted with sera from ALV-J-positive individuals. The vaccine demonstrated strong immunogenicity, with high antibody titers achieved within 42 days of immunization in chicks, and the immunity provided by the vaccine persisted for at least 126 days. Importantly, all vaccinated chicks were effectively protected against the ALV-J challenge. These findings highlight the potential of multi-epitope vaccines as a promising strategy for combating highly variable viruses, providing valuable insights into the development of effective ALV-J vaccines using epitope-based approaches (81).
Conclusion
Ongoing research on ALV has yielded important insights into its impact on poultry populations, facilitating the development of more effective control measures and reducing economic losses. Recent studies have focused on identifying viral subgroups, with specific attention given to the gp85 protein and its role in determining host specificity. Additionally, advancements in diagnostic methods, such as proteomic analysis and real-time reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA) assays, have provided more efficient and rapid means of detecting ALV infections. Furthermore, investigations into the transmission routes, both vertical and horizontal, have contributed to the development of control and eradication strategies that target the interruption of viral spread and the removal of infected individuals. These recent research findings have expanded our understanding of ALV pathogenesis and epidemiology, holding promise for improved diagnostics and management practices in the poultry industry. This advancement paves the way for more effective control and prevention measures in the future.
Conflicts of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Morteza Nikzad and Mohammad Hassan Bozorgmehri Fard were involved in the idea, design, data collection, and preparation of the paper. Mohammad Hassan Bozorgmehri Fard contributed to the supervision of the study and the drafting of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the article.
Funding statement
This research received no specific grant from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agency.
Acknowledgments
The authors extend their heartfelt gratitude to the members of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Tehran University for their invaluable support and encouragement throughout this work. Special thanks are due to Dr. Jamshid Razmyar, Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, and Dr. Venugopal Nair, Emeritus Scientist, Pirbright Institute, United Kingdom, for their meticulous review of the draft manuscript and their insightful suggestions, which greatly enhanced the quality and clarity of this study.
References
Legends to tables/Figures/videos
Figure 2. (A) Schematic representation of the tva coding sequence with exons and introns (top) and the design of gRNA used for CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of the tva gene (bottom). The target region of the tva gene is shown with the cleavage site (scissors), PAM sequence (in red), and gRNA sequence depicted in the line above. (B) Alignment of nucleotide sequences of the target region in wt and two PGC clones was used for further work with out‐of‐frame deletions. (C) Schematic summary of the workflow and timeline during genera -/-chickens. (46)
- 1. Caparini U. Fegati leucemici nei polli. Clin Vet. 1896;19:433-5.
- 2. Brothwell D. Ancient avian osteopetrosis: the current state of knowledge. Acta Zoologica Cracoviansia. 2002;45(Spec Iss):315-8.
- 3. Varmus H. How tumor virology evolved into cancer biology and transformed oncology. Annual Review of Cancer Biology. 2017;1:1-18.
- 4. Nair V, Gimeno I, Dunn J, Zavala G, Williams SM, Reece RL, Hafner S. Neoplastic diseases. Diseases of poultry. 2020:548-715.
- 5. Yehia N, El-Sayed HS, Omar SE, Amer F. Genetic variability of the Avian leukosis virus subgroup J gp85 gene in layer flocks in Lower Egypt. Veterinary World. 2020;13(6):1065.
- 6. Li X, Yu Y, Ma M, Chang F, Muhammad F, Yu M, et al. Molecular characteristic and pathogenicity analysis of a novel multiple recombinant ALV-K strain. Veterinary microbiology. 2021;260:109184.
- 7. Li H, Tan M, Zhang F, Ji H, Zeng Y, Yang Q, et al. Diversity of Avian leukosis virus subgroup J in local chickens, Jiangxi, China. Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):4797.
- 8. Přikryl D, Plachý J, Kučerová D, Koslová A, Reinišová M, Šenigl F, Hejnar J. The Novel Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup K Shares Its Cellular Receptor with Subgroup A. J Virol. 2019;93(17).
- 9. Li Y, Liu Y, Lin Z, Cui S, Chang S, Cui Z, et al. Role of env gene and LTR sequence in the pathogenesis of subgroup K avian leukosis virus. Journal of General Virology. 2022;103(2):001719.
- 10. Nair V. Tumors of the avian immune system. Avian Immunology: Elsevier; 2022. p. 457-68.
- 11. Tiwari A, Swamy M, Mishra P. Avian immunity and immunopathology of avian diseases. 2020.
- 12. Mo G, Wei P, Hu B, Nie Q, Zhang X. Advances on genetic and genomic studies of ALV resistance. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2022;13(1):1-14.
- 13. Cheng X, Yang J, Bi X, Yang Q, Zhou D, Zhang S, et al. Molecular characteristics and pathogenicity of a Tibet-origin mutant avian leukosis virus subgroup J isolated from Tibetan chickens in China. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2023;109:105415.
- 14. Schmucker S, Hofmann T, Sommerfeld V, Huber K, Rodehutscord M, Stefanski V. Immune parameters in two different laying hen strains during five production periods. Poultry Science. 2021;100(11):101408.
- 15. Løken OM, Bjørgen H, Hordvik I, Koppang EO. A teleost structural analogue to the avian bursa of Fabricius. Journal of Anatomy. 2020;236(5):798-808.
- 16. Peralta MF, Magnoli A, Alustiza F, Nilson A, Miazzo R, Vivas A. Gut-associated lymphoid tissue: A key tissue inside the mucosal immune system of hens immunized with Escherichia coli F4. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8:568.
- 17. Nagy N, Igyarto B, Magyar A, Gazdag E, Palya V, Olah I. Oesophageal tonsil of the chicken. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 2005;53(2):173-88.
- 18. Khomich V, Usenko S, Dyshliuk N. Morphofunctional features of the esophageal tonsil in some wild and domestic bird species. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems. 2020;11(2):207-13.
- 19. Fix AS. The structure and function of conjunctiva-associated lymphoid tissue in chickens and turkeys: Iowa State University; 1990.
- 20. Kogame T, Kabashima K, Egawa G. Putative immunological functions of inducible skin-associated lymphoid tissue in the context of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021;12:733484.
- 21. Debes GF, McGettigan SE. Skin-associated B cells in health and inflammation. The Journal of Immunology. 2019;202(6):1659-66.
- 22. Reese S, Dalamani G, Kaspers B. The avian lung-associated immune system. Veterinary research. 2006(3):311-24.
- 23. John JL. The avian spleen: a neglected organ. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 1994;69(3):327-51.
- 24. Ali SG, El-Deeb RM, El-Rahman A, Fawzia A. Ultrastructural study on the mucosa of the rectal caeca of the common kestrel, Falco tinnunculus rupicolaeformis, and the common moorhen, Gallinula chloropus. Egyptian Journal of Experimental Biology (Zoology). 2022;18(1).
- 25. Csernus VJ. The avian pineal gland. Chronobiology international. 2006;23(1-2):329-39.
- 26. Campbell F. Fine structure of the bone marrow of the chicken and pigeon. Journal of Morphology. 1967;123(4):405-39.
- 27. Cross G. The Avian Lymphatic System. The Avian Lymphatic System Association of Avian Veterinarians, Australasian Committee (AAVAC) University of Sydney, Cage Bird Medicine and Surgery Camden NSW. 1989:225-31.
- 28. NEIMAN P, EB G, CARLSON L, COTTER R, THOMPsON C, editors. Bursal StemCells as Targets for myc-Induced Preneoplastic. Mechanisms in B-Cell Neoplasia 1988: Workshop at the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, March 23–25, 1988; 2013: Springer Science & Business Media.
- 29. Kurth R, Bauer H. Cell-surface antigens induced by avian RNA tumor viruses: Detection by a cytotoxic microassay. Virology. 1972;47(2):426-33.
- 30. Schat KA, Skinner MA. Avian immunosuppressive diseases and immune evasion. Avian immunology: Elsevier; 2022. p. 387-417.
- 31. Witter R, editor Determinants of early transmission of ALV-J in commercial broiler breeder chickens. Proceeding of the International Symposium on ALV-J and Other Avian Retroviruses Rauischholzhausen, Germany; 2000.
- 32. Deng Q, Li Q, Li M, Zhang S, Wang P, Fu F, et al. The Emergence, Diversification, and Transmission of Subgroup J Avian Leukosis Virus Reveals that the Live Chicken Trade Plays a Critical Role in the Adaption and Endemicity of Viruses to the Yellow-Chickens. Journal of Virology. 2022;96(17):e00717-22.
- 33. Dong K, Heidari M, Mays J, Chang S, Xie Q, Zhang L, et al. A comprehensive analysis of avian lymphoid leukosis-like lymphoma transcriptomes including identification of LncRNAs and the expression profiles. PloS one. 2022;17(8):e0272557.
- 34. Meyers P. Antibody response to related leukosis viruses induced in chickens tolerant to an avian leukosis virus. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1976;56(2):381-6.
- 35. Wang H, Li W, Zheng SJ. Advances on innate immune evasion by avian immunosuppressive viruses. Frontiers in immunology. 2022;13:901913.
- 36. Samuel CE. Antiviral actions of interferons. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2001;14(4):778-809.
- 37. Schoggins JW, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes and their antiviral effector functions. Current opinion in virology. 2011;1(6):519-25.
- 38. Santhakumar D, Rubbenstroth D, Martinez-Sobrido L, Munir M. Avian interferons and their antiviral effectors. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8:49.
- 39. Goossens KE, Ward AC, Lowenthal JW, Bean AG. Chicken interferons, their receptors and interferon-stimulated genes. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2013;41(3):370-6.
- 40. Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, Foster GR, Stark GR. Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2007;6(12):975-90.
- 41. Der SD, Zhou A, Williams BR, Silverman RH. Identification of genes differentially regulated by interferon α, β, or γ using oligonucleotide arrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998;95(26):15623-8.
- 42. Zhang Q, Mo G, Xie T, Zhang Z, Fu H, Wei P, Zhang X. Phylogenetic analysis of ALV-J associated with immune responses in yellow chicken flocks in South China. Mediators of Inflammation. 2021;2021.
- 43. Chen Y, Li H. Avian leukosis virus subgroup J infection influences the gut microbiota composition in Huiyang bearded chickens. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2022;74(3):344-53.
- 44. Federspiel MJ. Reverse engineering provides insights on the evolution of subgroups A to E avian sarcoma and leukosis virus receptor specificity. Viruses. 2019;11(6):497.
- 45. Lee HJ, Park KJ, Lee KY, Yao Y, Nair V, Han JY. Sequential disruption of ALV host receptor genes reveals no sharing of receptors between ALV subgroups A, B, and J. Journal of animal science and biotechnology. 2019;10(1):1-14.
- 46. Koslová A, Trefil P, Mucksová J, Krchlíková V, Plachý J, Krijt J, et al. Knock-out of retrovirus receptor gene Tva in the chicken confers resistance to avian leukosis virus subgroups A and K and affects cobalamin (vitamin B12)-dependent level of methylmalonic acid. Viruses. 2021;13(12):2504.
- 47. Hellmich R, Sid H, Lengyel K, Flisikowski K, Schlickenrieder A, Bartsch D, et al. Acquiring resistance against a retroviral infection via CRISPR/Cas9 targeted genome editing in a commercial chicken line. Frontiers in Genome Editing. 2020;2:3.
- 48. Lounková A, Kosla J, Přikryl D, Štafl K, Kučerová D, Svoboda J. Retroviral host range extension is coupled with Env-activating mutations resulting in receptor-independent entry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(26):E5148-E57.
- 49. Swanstrom R, Graham WD, Zhou S. Sequencing the biology of entry: the retroviral env gene. Viruses, Genes, and Cancer. 2017:65-82.
- 50. Khare VM, Saxena VK, Tomar A, Nyinawabera A, Singh KB, Ashby Jr CR, Tiwari AK. Cytokine gene expression following RSV-A infection. Front Biosci. 2019;24(463):10.3389.
- 51. Silva APd, Gallardo RA. The chicken MHC: insights into genetic resistance, immunity, and inflammation following infectious bronchitis virus infections. Vaccines. 2020;8(4):637.
- 52. Bacon L, Hunt H, Cheng H. A review of the development of chicken lines to resolve genes determining resistance to diseases. Poultry science. 2000;79(8):1082-93.
- 53. Kheimar A, Klinger R, Bertzbach LD, Sid H, Yu Y, Conradie AM, et al. A genetically engineered commercial chicken line is resistant to highly pathogenic Avian leukosis virus subgroup J. Microorganisms. 2021;9(5):1066.
- 54. Zhao Y, Zhao C, Deng Y, Pan M, Mo G, Liao Z, et al. PMAIP1 promotes J subgroup avian leukosis virus replication by regulating mitochondrial function. Poultry Science. 2024;103(6):103617.
- 55. Wu L, Li Y, Chen X, Yang Y, Fang C, Gu Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of avian leukosis virus subgroup J associated with hemangioma and myelocytoma in layer chickens in China. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022;9:970818.
- 56. Eid AE, Abd-Ellatieff HA, Ellakany HF, Abou-Rawash A-RA, AbdEl-Hamid HS. Studies on tumor disease viruses in chickens in Egypt. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2019;60(1):184-95.
- 57. Qiao D, He Q, Cheng X, Yao Y, Nair V, Shao H, et al. Regulation of avian leukosis virus subgroup J replication by Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Viruses. 2021;13(10):1968.
- 58. Witter R. Avian tumor viruses: persistent and evolving pathogens. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 1997;45(3):251-66.
- 59. Zhou D, Xue J, Zhang Y, Wang G, Feng Y, Hu L, et al. Outbreak of myelocytomatosis caused by mutational avian leukosis virus subgroup J in China, 2018. Transboundary and emerging diseases. 2019;66(2):622-6.
- 60. Meng F, Li Q, Han R, Xu G, Gao X, Luo F, et al. A study on the infection status and transmission of avian leukosis virus subgroup J in Hy-line brown roosters. Archives of Virology. 2022;167(7):1521-7.
- 61. Meng F, Dong X, Hu T, Chang S, Fan J, Zhao P, Cui Z. A deep sequencing reveals significant diversity among dominant variants and evolutionary dynamics of avian leukosis viruses in two infectious ecosystems. BMC Veterinary Research. 2016;12(1):1-10.
- 62. Kaya SI, Karadurmus L, Ozcelikay G, Bakirhan NK, Ozkan SA. Electrochemical virus detections with nanobiosensors. Nanosensors for smart cities: Elsevier; 2020. p. 303-26.
- 63. Wang P, Yang Y, Lin L, Li H, Wei P. Complete genome sequencing and characterization revealed a recombinant subgroup B isolate of avian leukosis virus with a subgroup J-like U3 region. Virus genes. 2017;53:927-30.
- 64. Shao H, Wang L, Sang J, Li T, Liu Y, Wan Z, et al. Novel avian leukosis viruses from domestic chicken breeds in mainland China. Archives of virology. 2017;162(7):2073-6.
- 65. Liang X, Gu Y, Chen X, Li T, Gao Y, Wang X, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel natural recombinant avian leucosis virus from Chinese indigenous chicken flock. Virus genes. 2019;55:726-33.
- 66. Lv L, Li T, Hu M, Deng J, Liu Y, Xie Q, et al. A recombination efficiently increases the pathogenesis of the novel K subgroup of avian leukosis virus. Veterinary microbiology. 2019;231:214-7.
- 67. Chen X, Wang H, Fang X, Gao K, Fang C, Gu Y, et al. Identification of a novel epitope specific for Gp85 protein of avian leukosis virus subgroup K. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 2020;230:110143.
- 68. Liao L, Chen W, Zhang X, Zhang H, Li A, Yan Y, et al. Semen extracellular vesicles mediate vertical transmission of subgroup J avian leukosis virus. Virologica Sinica. 2022;37(2):284-94.
- 69. Chen S, Yan Y, Gao L, Gao S, Feng K, Li H, et al. Proteomic Profiling of Purified Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Particles. Veterinary Microbiology. 2023:109821.
- 70. Soliman YA, Gamal MA, El-Nagar EM, Khattab MS, Salem HM. Detection of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J in Egyptian Ducks and Chicken Using Molecular and Histopathological Approach and Allocation of Genetic Mutations and Recombination Events in the Envelope Protein Gene gp85. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research. 2023;13(2):277-87.
- 71. Mason AS, Miedzinska K, Kebede A, Bamidele O, Al-Jumaili AS, Dessie T, et al. Diversity of endogenous avian leukosis virus subgroup E (ALVE) insertions in indigenous chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution. 2020;52:1-7.
- 72. Wu X, Chu F, Zhang L, Chen S, Gao L, Zhang H, et al. New rapid detection by using a constant temperature method for avian leukosis viruses. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13:968559.
- 73. Qian K, Tian X, Shao H, Ye J, Yao Y, Nair V, Qin A. Identification of novel B-cell epitope in gp85 of subgroup J avian leukosis virus and its application in diagnosis of disease. BMC veterinary research. 2018;14:1-7.
- 74. Zheng L-P, Teng M, Li G-X, Zhang W-K, Wang W-D, Liu J-L, et al. Current epidemiology and co-infections of avian immunosuppressive and neoplastic diseases in chicken flocks in central China. Viruses. 2022;14(12):2599.
- 75. Roy S, Bondada MS, Zhang Y, Moffat K, Nair V, Yao Y. Proviral ALV-LTR Sequence Is Essential for Continued Proliferation of the ALV-Transformed B Cell Line. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(19):11263.
- 76. Payne L, Howes K. Eradication of exogenous avian leukosis virus from commercial layer breeder lines. The Veterinary Record. 1991;128(1):8-11.
- 77. Fotouh A, Shosha EAE-M, Zanaty AM, Darwesh MM. Immunopathological investigation and genetic evolution of Avian leukosis virus Subgroup-J associated with myelocytomatosis in broiler flocks in Egypt. Virology Journal. 2024;21(1):1-18.
- 78. Shittu I, Adedeji AJ, Luka PD, Asala OO, Sati NM, Nwagbo IO, et al. Avian leukosis virus subgroup–J as a contaminant in live commercially available poultry vaccines distributed in Nigeria. Biologicals. 2019;57:29-33.
- 79. Dai Z, Huang J, Lei X, Yan Y, Lu P, Zhang H, et al. Efficacy of an autophagy-targeted DNA vaccine against avian leukosis virus subgroup J. Vaccine. 2017;35(5):808-13.
- 80. Liu J, Gao K, Li D, Zeng Y, Chen X, Liang X, et al. Recombinant invasive Lactobacillus plantarum expressing the J subgroup avian leukosis virus Gp85 protein induces protection against avian leukosis in chickens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2022;106(2):729-42.
- 81. Wang X, Zhou D, Wang G, Huang L, Zheng Q, Li C, Cheng Z. A novel multi-variant epitope ensemble vaccine against avian leukosis virus subgroup J. Vaccine. 2017;35(48):6685-90.