Dimensions of Communication Breakdown in Digitally Mediated Relationships

Authors

    Mariam Grigoryan Department of Educational Psychology, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia
    Bálint Tóth * Department of Criminal Law, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary balint.toth@elte.hu

Keywords:

Digital intimacy, communication breakdown, relationship maintenance, emotional disconnection

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the underlying dimensions, triggers, and relational consequences of communication breakdown in digitally mediated romantic relationships.

Methods and Materials: The study employed a qualitative, descriptive–interpretive design based on semi-structured interviews with 25 participants (aged 22–43) residing in Hungary, who were currently or recently engaged in digitally mediated romantic relationships. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure diversity in relationship status and digital communication usage. Data were collected through in-depth, open-ended interviews focusing on experiences of misunderstanding, conflict, and emotional distance in digital interactions. The interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using NVivo 14 software. Through an inductive coding process, emerging patterns were categorized into main themes and subthemes reflecting the nature and mechanisms of communication breakdown.

Findings: The thematic analysis yielded four core dimensions of communication breakdown: (1) message ambiguity and misinterpretation, characterized by unclear tone, emotional detachment, and misread digital cues; (2) conflict escalation and digital triggers, including public exposure, reactive messaging, and asynchronous argument cycles; (3) emotional disconnection and relationship drift, reflected in reduced intimacy, digital fatigue, and avoidance behaviors; and (4) technological mediation barriers, involving platform fragmentation, algorithmic interference, and privacy-related constraints. The results indicated that digital communication both enables and destabilizes intimacy by amplifying emotional uncertainty and reducing contextual understanding.

Conclusion: Findings highlight the paradoxical role of technology as both a facilitator and disruptor of intimacy in modern relationships. Effective digital communication requires emotional regulation, boundary awareness, and mindful technology use. Addressing the psychological and technical dimensions of digital interaction can enhance relational stability and prevent emotional estrangement among partners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amber, R., & Carole, P. M. (2009). Long-Distance and Proximal Romantic Relationship Satisfaction: Attachment and Closeness Predictors. Journal of College Counseling, 12(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2009.tb00036.x

Inman, J. S. (2023). Evaluating the Influence of Reciprocity of Meeting Partner's Temperament Needs in Terms of Marital Intimacy. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/4685/

Pandya, S. P. (2025). Work‐Related Migration and Couples in Long‐Distance Marriages: Mindfulness, Marital Quality, Satisfaction, and Happiness. Personal Relationships, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.70002

Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Long Distance Intimacy: Class, Gender and Intergenerational Relations Between Mothers and Children in Filipino Transnational Families. Global Networks. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00122.x

Parsakia, K., & Rostami, M. (2023). Digital Intimacy: How Technology Shapes Friendships and Romantic Relationships. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.1.5

Pazil, N. H. A. (2018). Face, Voice and Intimacy in Long-Distance Close Friendships. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(11), 938-947. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2018.811.938.947

Pisor, A. C., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Smith, K. M. (2024). Long-distance social relationships can both undercut and promote local natural resource management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1893), 252-269. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0269

Pistole, M. C., Roberts, A., & Chapman, M. L. (2010). Attachment, Relationship Maintenance, and Stress in Long Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510363427

Regas, S. (2019). Infidelity, self-differentiation, and intimacy: The mindful differentiation model of couple therapy. In Integrative couple and family therapies: Treatment models for complex clinical issues. (pp. 71-90). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000151-004

Sawai, J. P., Sawai, R. P., Masdin, M., & Aziz, A. R. (2023). Sustaining Long-Distance Relationship Through Love, Trust, and Dedication Among Married Couples. Manu Jurnal Pusat Penataran Ilmu Dan Bahasa (Ppib), 34(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.51200/manu.v34i1.4475

Schafer, K., Hanson, T., & Brown, S. (2020). Examining the relationship between marital intimacy and marital satisfaction. Human Relations Journal, 73(4), 543-568. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5964&context=doctoral

Seifi, E., Ahmadi, A., & Moazzami, M. (2024). Identifying the dimensions and components of the application of new technologies in the fourth generation university. Management and Educational Perspective, 5(4), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2024.426783.1282

Smith-Osborne, A., & Jani, J. (2014). Long Distance Military and Civilian Relationships: Women's Perceptions of the Impact of Communication Technology and Military Culture. Military Behavioral Health, 2(4), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2014.963759

Timoshkin, D. (2023). Nationalism, Purity, and Danger: “Cross-Border Intimacy” in Russian Digital Media. Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review, 22(2), 154-178. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-2-154-178

Zhu, Y. (2025). Anonymous Intimacy in the Digital Age: Psychological Mechanisms, Risks, and Potential. Icarss, 2(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.33422/icarss.v2i1.1056

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-05-01

Submitted

2025-01-23

Revised

2025-04-11

Accepted

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Grigoryan, M., & Tóth, B. (2025). Dimensions of Communication Breakdown in Digitally Mediated Relationships. Applied Family Therapy Journal (AFTJ) , 6(3), 1-9. https://www.journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/aftj/article/view/4556