Combined Cognitive-Motor Training Improves Agility, Decision-Making, and Match Performance in Competitive Tennis Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

Keywords:

Cognitive-motor training; Tennis; Reactive agility; Decision-making; Match performance

Abstract

Objectives: Modern tennis performance requires the integration of perceptual-cognitive and movement-related abilities because of the dynamic and unpredictable nature of competitive match play. Although combined cognitive-motor training (CCMT) has received increasing attention in open-skill sports, evidence regarding its effectiveness in competitive tennis remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of CCMT on reactive agility, tennis-specific decision-making, and match performance in competitive tennis players.

Methods: This assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial used a parallel-group pretest–posttest design. Forty competitive tennis players aged 16–22 years were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 20) or a control group (n = 20). After two non-intervention-related withdrawals in the control group, the final per-protocol analysis included 38 participants. The experimental group completed an eight-week CCMT program integrated into their regular training schedule, whereas the control group continued regular tennis training only. Reactive agility, tennis-specific decision-making, and match performance were assessed before and after the intervention. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed model, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The experimental group showed a significantly greater reduction in reactive agility completion time than the control group (F = 18.72, p < 0.001). Significant group × time interaction effects were also found for decision-making accuracy (F = 16.94, p < 0.001) and decision-making response time (F = 14.27, p < 0.001), indicating greater increases in decision-making accuracy and greater reductions in response time in the experimental group. In addition, the experimental group demonstrated greater improvements in match-performance outcomes, including increased winners (F = 11.83, p = 0.002), reduced unforced errors (F = 13.26, p = 0.001), increased rally success percentage (F = 15.11, p < 0.001), increased point-winning efficiency (F = 13.02, p = 0.001), and improved tactical efficiency index (F = 12.48, p = 0.001). No serious adverse events or intervention-related injuries were reported during the intervention period.

Conclusion: Combined cognitive-motor training was more effective than regular tennis training alone in improving reactive agility, tennis-specific decision-making, and competitive match performance in competitive tennis players. These findings suggest that integrating cognitive challenges into representative sport-specific movement tasks may be an effective strategy for enhancing perceptual-cognitive and movement-related performance capacities in competitive tennis. Future studies should examine the long-term retention of these effects and clarify the mechanisms underlying cognitive-motor adaptation in sport-specific training environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] D. Beck, E. J. Hossner, and S. Zahno, “Exploiting prior knowledge in continuous decision-making under uncertainty: the case of tennis experts,” Exp. Brain Res., vol. 244, no. 5, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s00221-026-07288-9.

[2] C. Yufei and W. Ningning, “The relationship between visual spatial working memory capacity of tennis players and visual information processing of offensive tactical decision-making,” Front. Psychol., vol. 17, no. January, 2026, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1562462.

[3] Z. Zhao, Y. Liu, and K. Xu, “Optimizing Agility Training in Team Sport Players—The Role of Perception- Action Coupling: A Systematic Review with Multi-Level Meta-Analysis,” J. Sports Sci. Med., no. February, pp. 84–111, 2026, doi: 10.52082/jssm.2026.84.

[4] Z. Huang, X. Wei, X. Liu, and Y. Yang, “Integrating the dual-system theory in motor: dynamic framework construction for motor decision-making,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, no. January, pp. 1–13, 2026, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1720922.

[5] S. Lucia, M. Digno, I. Madinabeitia, and F. Di Russo, “Testing a Multicomponent Training Designed to Improve Sprint, Agility and Decision-Making in Elite Basketball Players,” Brain Sci., vol. 13, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/brainsci13070984.

[6] K. Zhang, W. S. Chan, H. S. Lau, D. Huang, and D. H. Chow, “The Crossover Effects of Visuomotor Task Complexity in Training Reactive Agility of Ball Sports Athletes,” J. Hum. Kinet., vol. 100, pp. 5–15, 2025, doi: 10.5114/jhk/210502.

[7] T. Icemet and Z. Zhang, “Improvement Effect of Repeated Sprint and Cognitive Combined Training on Tennis Players ’ Performance and High Pressure Decision Making,” no. Icemet 2025, 2026.

[8] C. Moca, A. PaȘcan, and P. Apostu, “Trends in Agility Development Research Among Tennis Athletes between 2024 and 2025,” Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, pp. 117–127, 2026, doi: 10.24193/subbeag.71(1).09.

[9] M. Zwierko, W. Jedziniak, M. Popowczak, and A. Rokita, “Reactive Agility in Competitive Young Volleyball Players: A Gender Comparison of Perceptual-Cognitive and Motor Determinants,” J. Hum. Kinet., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2022, doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0112.

[10] A. Shalom, R. Gottlieb, and J. Calleja-Gonzalez, “Closed vs. Open-Skill Contexts in Basketball: Insights into Reactive and Nonreactive Short Distance Sprint Performance More Closely Aligned with Game Demands ,” Sports, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2026, doi: 10.3390/sports14030115.

[11] V. Pavlinović et al., “Cognitive and Motor Capacities Are Poorly Correlated with Agility in Early Pubertal Children: Gender-Stratified Analysis,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14083148.

[12] G. Mulya, N. Nevitaningrum, R. Agustryani, N. Soraya, and T. Adi, “Effects of technical drill and plyometric training on shot accuracy in tennis athletes aged 16–19 with different agility levels,” Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, vol. 29, pp. 444–453, 2025, doi: 10.15561/26649837.2025.0506.

[13] L. Choo, A. Novak, F. M. Impellizzeri, C. Porter, and J. Fransen, “Skill acquisition interventions for the learning of sports-related skills: A scoping review of randomised controlled trials,” Psychol. Sport Exerc., vol. 72, no. February, p. 102615, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102615.

[14] R. Habib Qadoori, Q. M. Yas, S. A. Ismaeel, and M. H. Qadoori, “Evaluating Tennis Player Performance Based on Biomechanical Variables Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques,” Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://edu.pubmedia.id/index.php/jpo

[15] R. Zhu, D. Zou, K. Wang, and C. Cao, “Expert Performance in Action Anticipation: Visual Search Behavior in Volleyball Spiking Defense from Different Viewing Perspectives,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14030163.

[16] L. Souza, A. Rezende, and J. Carmo, “Instrument for Evaluation and Training of Decision Making in Dual Tasks in Soccer: Validation and Application,” Sensors, vol. 24, p. 6840, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24216840.

[17] J. Deng et al., “Noninvasive brain stimulation and athletic performance: a critical narrative review,” BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil., vol. 18, art. no. 71, 2026, doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01455-1.

[18] G. Esposito, R. Ceruso, S. Aliberti, and G. Raiola, “Ecological-Dynamic Approach vs. Traditional Prescriptive Approach in Improving Technical Skills of Young Soccer Players,” J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jfmk9030162.

[19] J. Cassidy, W. Young, A. Gorman, and V. Kelly, “Merging Athletic Development With Skill Acquisition: Developing Agility Using an Ecological Dynamics Approach,” Strength Cond. J., vol. Publish Ah, 2023, doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000791.

[20] Q. Li, Q. Fu, L. Li, and J. Wang, “Cognitive-coordination training: impact on sport-specific physical fitness and technical skill of adolescent basketball athletes,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, no. January, pp. 1–14, 2026, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1669608.

[21] R. Zhu, M. Zheng, S. Liu, J. Guo, and C. Cao, “Effects of Perceptual-Cognitive Training on Anticipation and Decision-Making Skills in Team Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, p. 919, 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14100919.

[22] C. Triolet and N. Benguigui, “Anticipation training for expert tennis players when facing a specific player,” Front. Psychol., vol. 15, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1508627.

Published

2026-07-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Muhammad Ali, Fadli Ihsan, Ugi Nugraha, Ilham, Zhanneta Kozina, & Bekir Erhan ORHAN. (2026). Combined Cognitive-Motor Training Improves Agility, Decision-Making, and Match Performance in Competitive Tennis Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Sport Studies for Health. https://www.journals.kmanpub.com/index.php/Intjssh/article/view/5526