Predictors of Online Health-Related Behaviors Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Outbreak in Iran
Keywords:
Predictors, COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare workers, online health-related behaviorsAbstract
This study sought to identify the factors that influence online health-related behaviors among Iranian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. The study utilized the Uses & Gratification and Self-Determination theories to explain the factors associated with workers' behaviors and their use of social media to share information about the pandemic. A decision tree technique known as the Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) was used to analyze the responses of 406 participants. The results revealed that healthcare workers' engagement in online health-related behaviors was primarily influenced by their attitude and motivation to use social media during the epidemic. Attitude was identified as the most important and first factor, while motivation was the second factor. The usefulness of information and interactions in the face of a health crisis can be linked to the development of self-efficacy and the promotion of social capital, as well as satisfaction with media. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of understanding the factors that drive healthcare workers' engagement in online health-related behaviors during a pandemic. The findings can be used to develop strategies to promote the use of social media for health-related purposes and improve healthcare workers' response to future pandemics.
Downloads
References
1. Moshtagh M, Mirlashari J, Amiri R. Global collaboration and social practices to mitigate impacts of COVID-19 in the world: a lived experience of infecting. Qualitative Social Work. 2021;20(1-2):366-74. [PMID: 34253980] [PMCID: PMC8261338]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020981088
2. Geana A, Wilson R, Daw ND, Cohen JD, editors. Boredom, Information-Seeking and Exploration. CogSci; 2016. https://www.princeton.edu/~ndaw/gwdc16.pdf
3. Yeung NCY, Lau JTF, Choi KC, Griffiths S. Population Responses during the Pandemic Phase of the Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Epidemic, Hong Kong, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):813-5. [PMID: 28418300] [PMCID: PMC5403031]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2305.160768
4. Jang K, Baek YM. When Information from Public Health Officials is Untrustworthy: The Use of Online News, Interpersonal Networks, and Social Media during the MERS Outbreak in South Korea. Health Communication. 2019;34(9):991-8. [PMID: 29558170] https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1449552
5. Abdelhafiz AS, Mohammed Z, Ibrahim ME, Ziady HH, Alorabi M, Ayyad M, Sultan EA. Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitude of Egyptians Towards the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Journal of Community Health. 2020;45(5):881-90. [PMID: 32318986] [PMCID: PMC7173684]. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10900-020-00827-7
6. Zhang M, Zhou M, Tang F, Wang Y, Nie H, Zhang L, You G. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding COVID-19 among healthcare workers in Henan, China. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2020;105(2):183-7. [PMID: 32278701] [PMCID: PMC7194961]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.012
7. Bode L, Vraga EK. See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media. Health Communication. 2018;33(9):1131-40. [PMID: 28622038] https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312
8. Jost JT, van der Linden S, Panagopoulos C, Hardin CD. Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2018;23:77-83. [PMID: 29427900] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.003
9. Kim B, Kim Y. College students’ social media use and communication network heterogeneity: Implications for social capital and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;73:620-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.033
10. Skurka C, Niederdeppe J, Romero-Canyas R, Acup D. Pathways of Influence in Emotional Appeals: Benefits and Tradeoffs of Using Fear or Humor to Promote Climate Change-Related Intentions and Risk Perceptions. Journal of Communication. 2018;68(1):169-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx008
11. Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine. 2020:1-7. [PMID: 32513320] [PMCID: PMC7298098]. https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS003329172000224X
12. Anspach NM, Carlson TN. What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation. Political Behavior. 2020;42(3):697-718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9515-z
13. Baeza-Yates R, Lalmas M. User engagement: the network effect matters! Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management; Maui, Hawaii, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2012. p. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2396761.2396763
14. Reeve J. A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, editors. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2012. p. 149-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
15. Reeve J. Understanding motivation and emotion: John Wiley & Sons; 2014. https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Motivation-Emotion-Seventh-Student/dp/1119367603
16. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2008;11(2):169-74. [PMID: 18422409] https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0056
17. Wang Z, Tchernev JM, Solloway T. A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28(5):1829-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.001
18. Diddi A, LaRose R. Getting Hooked on News: Uses and Gratifications and the Formation of News Habits Among College Students in an Internet Environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2006;50(2):193-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/
s15506878jobem5002_2
19. Williams AE. Trust or Bust?: Questioning the Relationship Between Media Trust and News Attention. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 2012;56(1):116-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.651186
20. Soenens B, Vansteenkiste M. A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review. 2010;30(1):74-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001
21. Kalyanaraman S, Sundar SS. The Psychological Appeal of Personalized Content in Web Portals: Does Customization Affect Attitudes and Behavior? Journal of Communication. 2006;56(1):110-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x
22. Shin D-H. Conceptualizing and measuring quality of experience of the internet of things: Exploring how quality is perceived by users. Information & Management. 2017;54(8):998-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.02.006
23. Liu H, Liu W, Yoganathan V, Osburg V-S. COVID-19 information overload and generation Z's social media discontinuance intention during the pandemic lockdown. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;166:120600. [PMID: 34876758] [PMCID: PMC8640972]. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.techfore.2021.120600
24. Fu S, Li H, Liu Y, Pirkkalainen H, Salo M. Social media overload, exhaustion, and use discontinuance: Examining the effects of information overload, system feature overload, and social overload. Information Processing & Management. 2020;57(6):102307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102307
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fatemeh Salmani, Mozhgan Moshtagh, Mitra Moodi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

